Prose poem number one

Do my silent screams echo across eternity?
Do they fall silent, slap the endless void, raindrops on the sea?
I keep them quiet, hide them well
But in my soul, my darkest depths, a psychic hell
Filled with wailing and gnashing of teeth.

Light and darkness tug me, ebb and flow, an evil, eternal tide.
Can’t they just leave me alone?
Once I stood on pillars above the deep,
On a foundation they said was forever
And I believed them, filled with pride
In myself for being so smart to find the truth.
But in a storm, the foundation crumbled beneath me.
Now I tread water and weep.

An island rises in the sea, a tiny spot of misery, the only land that I can see, a sandy beach of misery.
But it’s my home now, all I can find, a safe haven for my mind, I can make it something good if I wanted to, if I could.

Something primal burns my soul
Something ancient eats me whole.
Something drives me, keeps me, binds me
Something I flee soon will find me
Stand up tall and look up high
Shake my fist at darkened sky
Scream until my throat is dry
Sit back down and wait to die.

You gotta fight for your right to free TV

“How can one little insulated wire bring so much happiness?”
– Homer Simpson

TV tax or saving local TV?
TV tax or saving local TV? A new
fee is both, depending who you talk to.

There’s a war waging over free TV, which is apparently a fundamental human right.

That’s the argument advanced by cable companies, anyway, who launched a campaign earlier this year against the “TV tax.”

“You can dress this up any way you like, but the so called fee-for-carriage is a tax on TV viewers with absolutely no benefit,” says Jim Shaw, CEO and vice-chair of Shaw Communications, in a statement on the company’s website.

Them’s fightin’ words, and it sounds like I should be outraged about it, whatever it is.

“It is unfortunate the cable and satellite providers have resorted to scare tactics and misleading information,” fires back Paul Sparkes, executive vice-president of corporate affairs for CTVglobemedia on the “Local TV Matters” website.

Huh? What the h-e-double-hockey-sticks is this all about? Turns out TV stations are asking the CRTC (deep breath – the Canadian Radio-television Telecommunications Commission) to allow them to charge cable and satellite TV companies fees for reselling their channels.

The CRTC is the federal government organization which regulates all communication services in Canada. And unless people speak up, they’re going to allow those nasty greedy broadcasters to charge us more money on our monthly bills – so say the cable companies.
Cable and satellite providers have been trying for months to get people to leave comments with the CRTC opposing the “TV tax.” On Nov. 2, the CRTC will stop taking comments and will make a decision on whether or not to allow the fees.

CTV and other broadcasters across the country, including Vancouver Island’s A Channel and CHEK, have launched a counter-campaign, asking people to support their request for the fees, which isn’t new – broadcasters have been asking for them since the 1970s when cable TV started replacing over-the-air broadcasting as the norm.

These days, they really need the fee. Broadcasters can’t rely on advertising anymore. The stampede to high-definition, digital TV has required them to spend millions on new equipment, and they can’t get that investment back because the recession has been brutal for any media company which relies on advertising as its primary source of income. Recessions kill spending, which kills advertising, which kills pretty much every form of media you consume on a daily basis.

But what do you care, as long as you’re still getting it for free, right?

True, you pay a monthly fee for TV. But TV stations in your “basic package” don’t see any of it. Cable and satellite providers resell the stations and give them nothing in return.

That’s why they’re so desperate for the CRTC to let them charge fees for carriage to cable and satellite providers. If they don’t get it, stations may close, or at the very least, say goodbye to home-grown programming.

In contrast, while TV stations struggle to stay alive, during the worst part of the recession this spring National Bank Financial analyst Greg MacDonald called Canadian cable companies a “safe haven” for investors based on stable profit margins. And just this month, Shaw Communications reported that “despite the worst economic recession in seventy years, revenue and operating income for the year climbed 9 per cent in fiscal 2009. The company earned operating income of a whopping $1.54 billion on record revenues of $3.39 billion.”
Wow. What does that tell you? Maybe cable companies can afford to eat the new fee, which by the way is charged to them, not the customer. Cable companies are trying to paint the fee as a “tax” on customers, which is only true if they decide to pass it on to you.

They could choose to pay the fee out of their healthy profit margins. Pause for uproarious laughter.

Meanwhile, the war of words between cable companies and broadcasters is getting ugly as the Nov. 2 deadline looms. Cable companies accuse broadcasters of incompetence. Broadcasters accuse companies of greed. Customers shift uncomfortably in their La-Z-Boys as they struggle to decide whether or not to care.

Viewers could always turn off their TVs and read books instead, but we know that’s not going to happen. So I’ll make it easy. If you want to back the cable companies, go to the CRTC’s website and file a comment opposing the fee for carriage. If you want to back broadcasters, follow the same procedure, but file a comment in favour.

It’s easy, and you can at least say you had a chance for input.

And you can do it during the commercial break.

Why e-books are stupid

E-books trend is paradise lost for book nerds

Satan expelled from Paradise
Angels tease Satan because he doesn’t
have the latest e-book reader gadget.

The experience of finding an unexpected treasure in a used book store always gives me a buzz.

Guess I’m a book nerd.

This summer, at a dusty old shop in New Westminster, my attention was captured by an ugly, leather-bound monstrosity on the bottom shelf in the poetry section. Burned into the thick leather cover by an amateur hand was a picture of a log cabin in a forest by a river, with the word “Milton” underneath.

I sat down in the aisle, my back resting against a stack of dog-eared Beatles records, and opened the stiff leather cover. Inside was a homemade leather bookmark attached to the cover, as stiff as a steel-toed boot. I flipped it out of the way to discover a rare treasure – a 125-year-old printing of John Milton’s “Paradise Lost.”

The pages were gilt, like an expensive Bible, and the engraved illustrations exquisite. The words appeared to gently rise off the page, a side-effect of the printing techniques and quality paper used in making books a century ago.

But that wasn’t the best part. As I flipped through the pages, I came across an unusual bookmark – a carefully-clipped piece of newspaper, an 1897 birth announcement for Nellie McClung’s first-born son. Nellie McClung, who Canadian women can thank for fighting to get them the right to vote in 1916. It made me wonder whose book this once was.

I looked at the home-made cover again. Obviously someone loved this book enough to recover it once the original cover tore off. I imagined McClung, or her son, sitting by the woodstove on a freezing cold Manitoba night, reading by flickering firelight one of the greatest works of English literature.

I caught a whiff as I closed the cover again and brought it to my face to take a sniff. My nostrils filled with the aromatic smell of pipe tobacco. I again imagined one of the McClungs sitting on their porch at dusk, reading the book and smoking a pipe.

Guess I’m a romantic book nerd.

Fighting to keep a neutral, disinterested expression on my face, I dropped $8 in toonies into the hand of the bored-looking store owner and carried my treasure out of the store, striding nonchalantly around the corner before I felt it safe to crack a huge grin. I have no idea if the book’s actually worth anything and I don’t really care. To me, it’s priceless.

That’s why I think e-books are stupid. Once we’re all reading disposable Word documents on yet more Internet-enabled glowing rectangles, who will go into used bookstores looking for priceless treasures?

I also wonder what will happen to our libraries. It seems people would rather spend $300 to $400 for an awkward Star Trek display pad device that lets them read Dan Brown books electronically, looking like quasi-futuristic idiots in the airport lounge, than go to the library and borrow a book for free.

I suppose there must be some good reason to drop that kind of cash on a device to read books you can get for 50 cents at the thrift store, but I don’t know what it is. I’ve tried e-books. I’ve read lots of books on my Palm Pilot, mostly during city council meetings. It’s not fun, and not just because I’m at a council meeting.

The only good thing about e-books is the massive amount of classic books available for free through Project Gutenberg. For some of them, it’s worth staring at a glowing rectangle. Other than that, I can only think of two reasons why paper books will someday be replaced with e-books: one, humans are technology magpies who will adopt anything that looks futuristic and shiny, and two, there’s a lot of money to be made from them. Ergo, the powers that be will do whatever it takes to make them the de facto standard.

And there is a lot of money to be made. E-books sell online in Sony’s e-book store from 50 cents on a special deal to $10 for a new bestseller, to up to $20 for other “specialty” stuff. What a ripoff, it’s all the same to the publisher. Once the book is electronic, it costs them pennies to host a server somewhere for you to download it, regardless of whether it’s on “special” or not. A quick look through the store shows it’s actually cheaper to go buy a paper version you can read without charging the battery.

Out of curiousity, I found an electronic version of Paradise Lost in the store for $2, but I wouldn’t buy it. It’s just 3.5 megabytes of ones and zeros, and I’d never remember or absorb any of it by staring at a screen.

But I will remember and cherish the passages I read by firelight from my ugly, leather-bound monstrosity.

A deeper look: why e-books are stupid

As soon as you enter the electronic world, you quickly discover that not everything works the way you think it should.

I downloaded a pile of interesting (and free) books from Project Gutenberg, classics of religion, philosophy, archaeology and science. But some of the books displayed with errors on my Palm Pilot, and I had to mess around with changing settings, installing better reader software and formatting the downloaded files to work properly. Some of them were worth the hassle, others were not.

With a boring old paper book, you just open it up and start reading. It works on any platform, from tables to pillows to floors to your lap.

Holding an electronic device is just not as comfortable as a paperback, although engineers have tried valiantly to overcome this. You can read a paper book from any angle, and your eyes miraculously adjust in almost all lighting conditions to make reading comfortable. With an electronic device, you are stuck looking at a small, glowing rectangle which – at least in the case of my Palm – emits a slowly-maddening buzzing sound and is hard to see from even a slight angle.

Paper is the standard, whether e-book reader makers like it or not. I find it amusing that Sony’s e-reader offers “astonishing” paper-like display.

Why not just read a paper book, instead of an electronic device painstakingly designed to look like paper? What’s the appeal?

I guess you could argue that an e-reader lets you carry a whole library with you. But why? You can only read one book at a time anyway. When you’re finished the book, put it back on the shelf and take another one. Easy.

And be aware, e-books are not cheaper. A quick look through the e-book store run by Sony shows that while some books are available for 50 cents, and bestsellers are often on for about $10, the average price is the same or more than what you would pay for a paper book. This is absurd when you think about it. When books are first released, hardcovers are always more expensive, but those are the best quality. Wait six months or so for the $10 paperback if you don’t want to pay $30 for a hardcover. The price point for an average new e-book seems to be $13-14. Pretty pricey for something that only exists as ones and zeros.

I shouldn’t pick on Sony. There are other e-book sellers out there, but even if I wanted to buy an Amazon Kindle and download and read e-books, I can’t do it in Canada. Brilliant! Hooray for international copyright and digital rights management!

But I guess I must be one of a small number of people who think that paper book technology is just fine, thank you, and needs no electronic upgrade with all the headaches that brings. Even Disney has launched an e-book store which, for an annual fee, lets kids read “interactive” books featuring all their favourite Disney characters. Now, you don’t even need to read with your kids anymore, or encourage them to use their imaginations while reading a story. Disney will do it for you.

Do your kids a favour. Read with them. Read real books from your local library. Don’t just hand them another glowing rectangle to keep them amused while you watch TV.

Foaming at the mouth

Looks almost like what came out in my boy's diaper this morning. His had a bit more "added texture" though.

Looks almost like what came out in my boy's diaper this morning.

I knew the boy was too quiet.

Out of my sight for a few minutes, he had climbed up on to the kitchen table and started playing with his sister’s play foam, one of the presents from her weekend birthday party.

The stuff is small styrofoam balls, held together with magic glue that doesn’t stick to your fingers. It’s a bit like playing with the mix for Rice Krispies squares, before you bake it. It’s actually a lot of fun.

He seemed OK, just pulling it apart and sticking it back together, so I let him play with it on the floor beside me while I worked on my website.

I looked down a minute later and he was tonguing a great wad of green and yellow foam out of his mouth.

I grabbed him and despite his attempts to escape, bite off my finger and burst my eardrums, I picked the rest out of his mouth. I put the foam away.

This morning, he filled two diapers with little balls of coloured styrofoam. I was horrified, but had to laugh. Guess he swallowed a bunch when I wasn’t looking. Maybe that space-age magic glue will help clean out his garbage guts.

We didn’t try and salvage the foam that came out in his diaper, in case anyone was wondering.

Vanity, vanity

Well, I’ve linked this site to my own domain name now, grantwarkentin.com

How vain of me, I know! Ooh, look at me, I have my own dot-com domain for my name! How precious!

Well, maybe I’ll figure out a way to make some money at this. I’m also launching a new business website, more details to follow on that, but I think it’s a good idea. I just need to get my butt in gear (what a strange metaphor) and do it. I started, so hooray.

Ubuntu netbook remix a winner

Acer AspireOne netbook running Ubuntu 9.04 netbook remix

Acer AspireOne netbook running Ubuntu 9.04 netbook remix

I finally decided to install Ubuntu Linux Netbook Remix on my Acer AspireOne ZG5 (the one with the 8GB SSD drive). It’s performing very well — boots up in under one minute, shuts down in under 10 seconds and experiences very few of the SSD performance hangs common under Windows XP whenever the OS would hit the wimpy little solid-state drive.

It runs Firefox very well, and also runs GIMP, perfect for some basic photo manipulation for blog posts, etc. Software additions are fast and easy through the built-in Synaptic Package Manager, which finds all the files I need, installs and configures them for me.

And the built-in Totem Movie Player is fantastic, it found and downloaded all the necessary codecs and plays movies encoded for iTunes or DivX/xviD flawlessly. The player also has the ability to force movies to play in whatever aspect ratio I want, great for movies which have been incorrectly squished or stretched.

I have only two small problems. First, the wireless switch and LED do not work at all. However, this is purely cosmetic and the software wireless network connection manager works very well (better than the Windows equivalent). Second, the card reader on the right side of the computer does not work, unless I boot with an SD card in the slot. This is not a big deal since the left-hand card slot works fine, with or without a card in at boot, but if I ever want to make the right-hand slot work there is a workaround, adding “pciehp.pciehp_force=1″ (minus the quotes) to the kernel right after the line “ro quiet splash” (again minus the quotes). I can get at the appropriate file by opening a terminal window and typing “sudo gedit /boot/grub/menu.lst” (minus the quotes, duh) and entering the line as described above.

But it’s not a big deal, and I don’t really want to do it because it results in a few lines of code being displayed on startup and I want to keep it looking pretty so I can impress all my friends ;)

Ubuntu on Acer Aspire One

I’ve been playing around with the Ubuntu Linux netbook remix, a version of the Ubuntu Linux operating system designed specifically for small netbook computers like my Acer Aspire One.

I downloaded the bootable image and put it on a 4-gig Lexar Firefly flash drive. The netbook booted and ran just fine, and everything worked so well I am seriously contemplating ditching XP (which came preinstalled on the machine) for Ubuntu.

Here are some time trials. And FYI my netbook is the ZG5, with the 8 GB SSD (solid-state drive) built-in which has been critized for being very slow. Even running Ubuntu on a flash drive, I noticed the SSD seemed to be snappier, not pausing the system during saves/loads like in XP.

Here’s a rough comparison:

Windows XP: Took 2:23 to boot from power off to running web browser, connected to the Internet (running Google Chrome browser).

Ubuntu (on flash drive “Live CD”): Took 1:20 to get to desktop from power off, another 10 seconds to start Firefox. I bet it’s even faster running off the SSD.

Windows XP: Took five seconds to start AbiWord.

Ubuntu: Took 13 seconds to start pre-installed OpenOffice 3.0.

Windows XP: Took 27 seconds to start GIMP photo manipulation program.

Ubuntu: Took 18 seconds to start GIMP.

They’re pretty comparable. But the fast start-up time (and shut-down time) in Ubuntu is good for me. But even though I really like Ubuntu I don’t know if I will switch yet.

PROS: Ubuntu starts fast, shuts down fast, has a really nice user interface that’s easy to use, has good built-in games, has Open Office built-in and has a better wi-fi detection and connection system than Windows XP. SSD seems more responsive and fonts look nicer than XP.

CONS: Wi-fi switch and LED do not work in version of Ubuntu (9.04) I tested. Waking up from suspending machine opens up file system window for the LH SD card (always inserted on my machine). A known problem on the Aspire One is that the SD card slots do not work unless you boot with cards inserted in them. There are allegedly workarounds for this and the wifi LED issue,  but do I really want to fix them when Windows XP works as-is?

CONCLUSION: I like Ubuntu, and would be happy with it on my machine, but it’s a step sideways, not a step up. I might put it on though, for the faster boot and shut-down times and better use of SSD. Waiting several seconds every time a doc auto-saves is getting annoying, and it doesn’t seem to do that in Ubuntu. If they can fix the SD card and wifi LED and switch issues in the next release, I think I will definitely put it on.

Going to the beach

Gonna take the kids down to the beach this morning for a low tide. Maybe we’ll find some cool sea life! Last time we went we found some huge moon snails. This beach isn’t as nice as that one, but there’s  still lots to see.

I find it amazing how much life there is  at the beach. Stand still long enough and you’ll see millions of creatures. The sand is from countless numbers of their crushed shells collected and ground into minute particles over the years.

I see that as evidence of evolution. All the creatures that have lived and died form the foundation for the next generations to thrive, to adapt and to lay the foundation for the next generation after that.

Pope tries to find common ground between three religions which hate each other

At an outdoor mass Tuesday in the Kidron Valley in Jerusalem, and also at the Dome of the Rock, Pope Benedict XVI called on Christians, Muslims and Jews to put their differences behind them and move towards reconciliation.

He called on Jews, Muslims and Christians to put aside things that divide them.
“Jews, Muslims and Christians alike call this city their spiritual home… There should be no place within these walls for narrowness, discrimination, violence and injustice,” Benedict said. “Believers in a God of mercy … must be the first to promote this culture of reconciliation and peace, however, painstakingly slow the process may be, and however, burdensome the weight of past memories.”

In a speech to Muslim leaders Tuesday morning, he said reason shows us the shared nature and common destiny of all people. He then said:

“Undivided love for the One God and charity towards ones neighbour thus become the fulcrum around which all else turns.”

Good luck with that, Benny.

This message has been approved by the Space Pope.

No one wants new cars

“Three-quarters of Americans OK with General Motors, Chrysler falling into bankruptcy,” says the Dallas News headline.
Yeah, that’s about right. People are waking up to realize they’ve been sold a load by the “Big 3″ for the past 50 years. They’ve been trying to convince people they need a new car every two to three years, and millions believed it. Now we realize it’s a nice-sounding lie. Nobody NEEDS a car every two years. Few people actually NEED a car and even fewer need more than one. But they’re just so convenient!
The truth is we have more cars than we know what to do with. Now that people are realistically living within their means — or trying to — new cars are just taking up space. Toyota is storing unsold cars in the Port of Long Beach and has rented a cargo ship to store unsold cars off the coast of Sweden.
But wait, there’s more… watch this video. It’s breathtaking.

Next Page »


Tweets

  • Goddam truck won't start, not getting any fuel or something 1 day ago
  • Great, caught a gut bug from my daughter. On the plus side, satellite TV installer is almost done. 1 day ago
  • Feeling the chhill of winter. 1 week ago
  • Waiting for my turn to get a haircut. Family pix today, very stressful. 2 weeks ago
  • Come on coffee & A535 Kick in already! 2 weeks ago

Latest links